Hijacking Campaign 2023

Hijacking Campaign 2023 - Issue Ads

Hijacking Campaign 2023 | Independent Expenditures | Issue Ads | Candidates | Campaign 2023

Posted: January 18, 2023
Updated: March 26, 2024

Organizations running “issue ads” in the spring 2023 Wisconsin State Supreme Court election or the 8th State Senate special.

Any organizations involved in the the non-partisan supreme court election are listed on the left, those involved in the special on the right. Any organization involved in both set of elections appears in both columns.

Hijacking Campaign 2023 - Independent Expenditures

Hijacking Campaign 2023 | Independent Expenditures | Issue Ads | Candidates | Campaign 2023

Posted: January 18, 2023
Updated: March 26, 2024

Organizations making independent expenditures supporting or opposing candidates in the spring 2023 Wisconsin State Supreme Court election and the 8th State Senate special election.

Organizations involved in the non-partisan supreme court election are listed on the left, those involved in the special on the right. Any organization involved in both set of elections is listed in both columns.

Click on a committee's name for more information.

Independent Expenditure Committees

Spring

350 Wisconsin Action Inc.

AFT-Wisconsin 

All on the Line 

Alliance for Justice Action Campaign 

American Majority Action 

American Principles Project PAC 

Americans for Prosperity

Americas PAC IEO

A Better Wisconsin Together Political Fund

BLOC PAC

Blue Sky Waukesha, Inc.

Citizen Action of Wisconsin Inc.

Climate Emergency Advocates 

Committee to Protect Health Care

Dunn County Democratic Party

Emerging Voters Inc.

Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund Inc. PAC 

Fair Courts America

Family Friendly Action PAC 

Freedom Action Now, Inc.

FreedomWorks for America

Hunter Nation Inc.

Indivisible Action 

Juneau Co Republican Party

Justice for Wisconsin

March On

Minocqua Brewing Company Super PAC

MoveOn.Org Political Action

National Redistricting Action Fund

New Prosperity Foundation (Independent Expenditure Committee) 

NRA Political Victory Fund - Federal PAC 

One for All Committee 

Organizing Empowerment PAC

Planned Parenthood Advocates of Wisconsin Political Fund

Power to the Polls Action Fund

Progress North

Project 72 WI PAC

Project Democracy

Republican Party-Eau Claire County

Republican State Leadership Committee - Judicial Fairness Initiative

Rock County First Political Fund

Safe Families Wisconsin 

SEIU Wisconsin Healthcare and Service Workers Stronger Together

SEIU Wisconsin State Council Independent Expenditure Committee

Service Employees International Union Committee on Political Education

Somos PAC

Stand Up America, Inc.

Tech for Campaigns 

Tides Advocacy

Voces de la Frontera Action Inc.

Volunteers for Agriculture

VoteVets 

WEAC Region 6 PAC 

WEAC Region 7 PAC 

Wisconsin Conservation Voters Independent Expenditure Committee

Wisconsin Family Action, Inc. - 1.91 Account

Wisconsin Muslim Civic Alliance

Wisconsin Right to Life PAC

WMC Jobs Fund

Women Speak Out PAC

Women's March Win 

Working America

Hijacking Campaign 2023 - Candidates

Hijacking Campaign 2023 | Independent Expenditures | Issue Ads | Candidates | Campaign 2023

Posted: January 18, 2023
Update: September 4, 2023

If there is a link, click on a candidate's name to see any independent expenditures reported as explicitly for or against that candidate. If no such spending has been reported, there will be no link.

Click on the office link to see all independent expenditures spent on that office, if any.

 

CandidatePartyOfficeElection
Brandtjen, Janel Republican Senate District 8 Special
Dorow, Jennifer R Non-Partisan Supreme Court Spring
Habush Sinykin, Jodi L Democrat Senate District 8 Special
Kelly, Daniel Non-Partisan Supreme Court Spring
Knodl, Dan Republican Senate District 8 Special
Melotik, Paul Republican Assembly District 24 Special
Mitchell, Everett D Non-Partisan Supreme Court Spring
Mobley, Van Republican Senate District 8 Speical
Protasiewicz, Janet Non-Partisan Supreme Court Spring
Tatterson, Bob Democrat Assembly District 24 Special

Hijacking Campaign 2023 - Information on Fair Courts America

Hijacking Campaign 2023 | Independent Expenditures | Issue Ads | Candidates | Campaign 2023

Posted: January 30, 2023
Updated: March 25, 2024

Spring: OathSpending

This is a Downers Grove, Ill. group funded by rightwing billionaire Richard Uihlein that makes independent expenditures to help elect conservative judges.

Uihlein and his wife, Elizabeth, of Lake Forest, Ill., founded Uline, a shipping and packaging supply company. The couple are among the leading backers of Republican and conservative state and federal candidates and causes in the country.

In  November 2022, Fair Courts announced it would spend millions of dollars to support conservative former Justice Dan Kelly’s bid to return to the high court. Kelly was appointed in 2016 by GOP Gov. Scott Walker to fill a vacancy on the court but failed to win election in 2020 to a full 10-year term.

The winner of the open-seat race in April would replace retiring conservative Justice Patience Roggensack determing whether or not conservatives would keep their 4-3 majority on the court.

Kelly was among four candidates – two conservatives and two liberals – who squared off in the nonpartisan Feb. 21 primary. Kelly and liberal Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Janet Protasiewicz survived the primary and faced each other in the April 4 election.

In late January, before the primary, the group reported spending $300,000 on a statewide 60-second radio touting Kelly as a conservative whose election would prevent liberals from taking a 4-3 majority on the high court.

In early February, the group reported spending more than $512,000 on a television ad in the Milwaukee, Green Bay, and Wausau viewing areas that mirrored the earlier radio ad. It said Kelly's election would prevent a liberal takeover of the Supreme Court.

By the time of the primary, Fair Courts had reported spending a total of nearly $2.4 million on television ads in support of Kelly.

At the beginning of March, the organization created a now inactive website promoting Kelly.

In early March, the group sponsored an ad claiming Protasiewicz gave a light sentence to a convicted felon who abducted and raped a 15-year-old girl. A few days after the ad premiered, Fair Courts reported spending another $975,000 for television ads backing Kelly.

With less than four weeks to go before the election, Fair Courts reported spending over another $800,000 for television advertisments and mailers to support Kelly.

About three weeks before the election, it reported spending over another $459,000 for radio ads backing Kelly.

About a week before the election, Fair Courts reported spending over $600,000 for television and Facebook advertising in the race. A few days later, it reported yet another $100,00 for television advertising. Like several others run by this group and others, the television ad accused Protasiewicz of handing down a light sentence in a rape case.

The day before the election, it reported spending a further $225,000 for online advertising to support Kelly.

In spring 2022, the group spent $250,000 on television ads to support a conservative Waukesha County circuit judge’s successful bid for the state’s 2nd District Court of Appeals. At the time, Fair Courts’ treasurer and address were the same as the treasurer and address listed for Restoration PAC, a superPAC almost solely funded since 2016 by Uihlein.

This organization is registered with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission as an independent expenditure committee following the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC.

Hijacking Campaign 2023 - Information on Republican State Leadership Committee Inc.

Hijacking Campaign 2023 | Independent Expenditures | Issue Ads | Candidates | Campaign 2023

Posted: February 2, 2023
Updated: March 26, 2024

Special: OathSpending

This corporation is run by the Republican State Leadership Committee to make independent expenditures in support of Republican legislative candidates in Wisconsin and throughout the country.

The organization spent over $6.5 million between 2010 and 2022 on independent expenditures and phony issue ads in Wisconsin legislative and statewide races, making it one of the top interest group spenders on Badger State elections.

A special election was held in April 2023 to fill a vacancy in the 8th State Senate district. The suburban Milwaukee district was left vacant late in 2022 when long-time GOP Sen. Alberta Darling resigned.

A three-way Republican primary was held on Feb. 21 featuring Rep. Dan Knodl of Germantown, Rep. Janel Brandtjen, and Van Mobley, a former primary candidate for State Superintendent of Public Instruction in 2009. Brandtjen, an Assembly Republican from Menomonee Falls since 2014, is a supporter of Trump and his false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him.

The PAC spent over $163,500 for mailers, texts, and television ads to support Knodl in the primary.

Knodl won the primary and defeated Democrat Jodi Habush Synikin in the April 4 election.

After the primary, the committee reported spending $40,000 for television ads backing Knodl against Habush Sinykin.

Last active election: 2022

This organization is registered with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission as an independent expenditure committee following the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC.

Hijacking Campaign 2023 - Information on A Better Wisconsin Together Political Fund

Hijacking Campaign 2023 | Independent Expenditures | Issue Ads | Candidates | Campaign 2023

Posted: February 6, 2023
Updated: March 22, 2024

Spring: OathSpending
Special: OathSpending

This independent expenditure committee, which has a Monona address, was created to support Democratic and left-leaning candidates for statewide office and the legislature. A Better Wisconsin also conducts issue ad campaigns.

A Better Wisconsin Together Political Fund was first active in the 2020 Wisconsin State Supreme Court election and has since reported spending nearly $10.9 million in subsequent fall and spring elections. It quickly became one of the top-spending outside electioneering groups in Wisconsin.

Most of the group’s contributions came from labor union political action committees (PACs) and corporations, and Democratic ideological groups.

Supreme Court (Spring)

In early February, the committee reported spending nearly $829,000 for online and television advertising to oppose Waukesha Circuit Court Judge Jennifer Dorow in the Feb. 21 primary for the Wisconsin State Supreme Court. Dorow was one of four candidates, including former Supreme Court Justice Daniel Kelly, running for the seat vacated by retiring Justice Patience Roggensack. Both Dorow and Kelly were appointed to the bench by former GOP Governor Scott Walker. The top two vote getters - Kelly and Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Janet Protasiewicz - faced off in the April 4 election.

Protasiewicz won the seat.

The group's television and online ads in the primary - here, here, here, here, and here - accused Dorow of letting domestic abusers, sexual predators, and other criminals "off the hook" with light sentences or no prison time since she became a circuit court judge.

In total, the group spent over $2.1 million for online and television ads opposing Dorow in the primary.

With the defeat of Dorow, A Better Wisconsin turned its attention to Kelly, as three days after the primary, it reported over $805,000 for online and television advertising opposing his election. Three days after that, it reported spending over another half a million dollars on television ads against Kelly. One ad claimed Kelly once compared people on Social Security and Medicare to welfare recipients. Another television ad and an online ad said Kelly opposed abortion rights and was supported by groups who would ban abortion with no rape or incest exceptions.

In subsequent weeks leading up to the election, A Better Wisconsin reported spending nearly $2.3 million for online advertising and mailers opposing Kelly.

Five days before the election, the organization reported spending another $430,000 for online advertisements in the race. Three of the digital ads - here, here, and here - that appeared days before the election accused Kelly of wanting to keep abortion illegal, trying to make it harder to vote, supporting former President Donald Trump's attack on the 2020 elections, and opposing gay marriage.

The day of the election, the group reported spending over $35,000 on phone banks to support Protasiewicz.

Special

Concurrent with the high court election was a special election to fill a vacancy in suburban Milwaukee's 8th State Senate District following the December retirement of long-time Republican incumbent Alberta Darling. Democrat Jodi Habush Sinykin faced Republican Rep. Dan Knodl of Germantown in the April 4 election. Knodl had survived a three-way Republican primary held at the same time as the Wisconsin State Supreme Court primary. There was no Democratic primary. Knodl won the election.

With less than two weeks remaining before the election, A Better Wisconsin first reported spending nearly $5,000 for online advertising to support the Democrat in the race.

Last active election: 2022

This organization is registered with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission as an independent expenditure committee following the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC.

Hijacking Campaign 2023 - Information on Justice for Wisconsin

Hijacking Campaign 2023 | Independent Expenditures | Issue Ads | Candidates | Campaign 2023

Posted: February 10, 2023
Updated: March 25, 2024

Spring: OathSpending

This is a new committee based in De Pere that filed paperwork to make independent expenditures in the spring 2023 race for a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

The group’s treasurer, Cathy Zeuske is a former GOP Assembly representative and former state revenue secretary. The committee’s address is the same as a packaging and mailing business called Pack and Ship LLC.

Four candidates – two conservatives and two liberals – faced of in a Feb. 21 primary for the officially nonpartisan Wisconsin State Supreme Court. The two top finishers moved on to the the April 4 general election to replace retiring Justice Patience Roggensack, a member of the court's 4-3 conservative majority at the time.

In early February, the group spent $55,000 on radio advertisements to support Jennifer Dorow, a Waukesha County Circuit Court judge and one of the two conservative candidates in the primary race.

Dorow did not make it through the primary. Liberal Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Janet Protasiewicz defeated former Supreme Court Justice Daniel Kelly, the other conservative, in the April 4 election.

This organization is registered with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission as an independent expenditure committee following the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC.

Hijacking Campaign 2023 - Information on One for All Committee

Hijacking Campaign 2023 | Independent Expenditures | Issue Ads | Candidates | Campaign 2023

Posted: February 10, 2023
Updated: March 26, 2024

Spring: OathSpending

This is a Washington, D.C.-based group that registered with the state to make independent expenditures in the race Wisconsin Supreme Court this spring.

The group’s website provides little information about the special interests behind it other than it is “dedicated to connecting with and persuading women to vote for an America that works for all of us.”

During the fall 2022 elections, the group sponsored videos to support Democratic candidates for the U.S. Senate, including Mandela Barnes in Wisconsin and John Fetterman in Pennsylvania.

Four candidates – two conservatives and two liberals – ran for a 10-year open seat on the officially nonpartisan Wisconsin Supreme Court. The Feb. 21 primary reduced that number to two: Former Wisconsin State Supreme Court Justice Dan Kelly, a conservative appointee to the court who was voted off the court in 2020, and Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Janet Protasiewicz, a liberal. They faced off in the April 4 general election with the winner replacing retiring conservative Justice Patience Roggensack. The outcome of the election would determine the ideological balance of the court as conservatives enjoyed a 4-3 majority before Roggensack's retirement.

Protasiewicz won the election and took her seat the following August shifting the court from a conservative to a liberal majority.

In early February, the group filed paperwork showing it spent $125,000 on videos to support Protasiewicz in the primary. Five days before the primary, the committee reported spending another $325,000 for online ads in her support.

This organization is registered with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission as an independent expenditure committee following the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC.

Hijacking Campaign 2023 - Information on American Principles Project PAC

Hijacking Campaign 2023 | Independent Expenditures | Issue Ads | Candidates | Campaign 2023

Posted: February 11, 2023
Updated: March 25, 2024

Spring: OathSpending

Based in Arlington, VA, American Principles Project PAC is sponsored by the American Principles Project, a think tank that advocates for socially conservative issues. It registered with the state in February 2023 to make independent expenditures in the 2023 spring Wisconsin State Supreme court election, but it first involved itself in Wisconsin state-level politics with the 2022 fall election when it operated as an unregistered committee.*

Four candidates – two conservatives and two liberals – faced off in a Feb. 21 nonpartisan primary for a 10-year seat on the high court to replace retiring conservative Justice Patience Roggensack. Former Wisconsin State Supreme Court Justice Daniel Kelly and Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Janet Protaseiwicz were the two primary winners and faced each other in the April 4 election. Kelly, a conservative appointee of former GOP Governor Scott Walker, lost his seat on the bench in the 2020 election. Protasiewicz was supported by liberal groups.

The winner of the election would determine the ideological balance of the court, which was controlled 4-3 by conservatives at the time of the election. Protasiewicz won the election.

Eleven days before the primary, the PAC first reported spending nearly $67,000 on digital advertising and peer-to-peer messaging in support of Kelly.

Ten days after the primary, the group reported spending over $245,000 on digital advertising to support Kelly. The digital ad claimed Protasiewicz had the support of groups that want to take away parental rights and that Kelly would defend parental rights and "put an end to trans (transgender) indoctrination in our schools."

In mid-March, the committee reported spending over another $483,000 for online advertising supporting Kelly.

*Registered committees are required to report all financial activities and sources of income to the state. Unregistered committees are only required to report election expenditures made within sixty days of a primary or an election.

Last active election: 2022

This organization is registered with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission as an independent expenditure committee following the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC.